The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
The topic of government’s initiatives referring to citizen’s well-being has been widely debated in the modern society. Namely, an opinion exists, that the sphere of spiritual entertainment should not be not be sponsored in favor of other public goods development. Although I consider that financial support of basic attributes of the social benefits is vital, investments in the culture propaganda should be taken in the action.
On the one hand, providing for constant work of public services is crucial in order to prevent any issues linked with basic population needs. Since the continually transformation of the global world unavoidably leads to the growth of the nowadays states opportunities, high demand for the high-level maintenance appears. Needless to say, the backing of the well-organized system that will be able to create the environment meeting the citizenry expectations is essential for their state. For instance, about 90 percent of survey contestants from ‘Severodvinsk voice’ journal are convinced, that their local government should give attention to this problem as for prioritized direction. Thus, concept of civic amenities funding plays and important role in every state and should be taken into consideration.
On the other hand, the field of mental-entertainment tools subsidizing becomes essential in the terms of reality. The countless flow of negative emotions within the high volume of populations’ stress requires delivery of mechanisms for emotions relief. Moreover, the empathy issues that usually appear due to the lack of natural ways of the mind recharge can perform the grave harm to public relationships. As ‘Zelenograd insides’ states, the average level of stress towards citizens of Zelenograd has been dropped significantly since the focus on the aesthetic infrastructures was produced. Hence, the sponsorship of the creativity facilities should be moved to the forefront as fast as it possible.
To conclude, the public goods investments are important, but underestimating of the art factor will lead to the failure. Even if money spending for culture sake may seems unnecessary, this will surely become a remedy for population mental health improvement in many cases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-16 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-11 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | ZAINBM | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Kaur_Aman | 67 | view |
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 73
- People today know fewer of their neighbors than in the past Why is this What can be done to solve this problem 89
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs Which one of these opinions do you agree with Use spe 76
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworm and the stages in the production of silk cloth 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'not be'.
Suggestion: not be
...phere of spiritual entertainment should not be not be sponsored in favor of other public good...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...t be sponsored in favor of other public goods development. Although I consider that ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...her public goods development. Although I consider that financial support of basi...
^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the high volume of populations’ stress requires delivery of mechanisms for emot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, as for, for instance, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1894.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60355029586 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28000180188 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2021241001 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.266666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136903994685 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420923096498 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386569860558 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805854659749 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034232163012 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.