The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order to for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order to for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?

Developing and progressing could be reached if the state obligate the budgeting more into teaching sciences than other subjects in school. However, every subject has its own potential and value. I personally disagree to some extent about the government opinion with overlooking the other subjects instead science and I will explain why in this essay.

On the one hand, it is true that learning sciences as syllabus can improve a nation to produce the subject specialist and scientist better in the next generation. it is also possible that whenever the educators and students easily pursue their futher education in monodisciplinary sciences they can attempt their career in advancing of a country. The sub-subject of sciences which have been provided – from bachelor to post doctoral program – are that computer science, biology, chemic, medicine and geology. Since those could be studied, it could open their opportunity to the better specific occupation, such as medical doctor, dentist, food chemist, IT analysist, engineering to expand the quality of country environment, technology and healthcare.

On the other hand, though, we should consider about evolving other substances such as ecology, politic and economy where those are undeniable to be neglected to overcome the probability of country prosperousness. Additionally, it is believed that if ecology city-system was applied , the infrastructure and urban living-system would be approached well. Moreover, the multi-benefits may be obtained in empowering regulation and national constitution and in advancing the economic growth in instilling from the socio-political and socio-economic fields. other considering is that the literature and the art fields can not be disavowed in the hope that preventing the loss of identity and uniqueness of a nation is also tremendously essential. For example, enrolling the history, craft and art aspects can acquire the awareness to the young generation. Furthermore, enhancing the literature insight, not only does it preserve the original language of vernacular region but also it evokes the jargon in a country.

Overall, it seems to me that the authority funding should not be restricted to the science subject only. Meanwhile, the other subjects are also worth implementing due to national financial and infrastructure growth. Moreover, the whole, it can be reached as long as the government should consider to fund equivalently in both subjects

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-17 aangkasut 84 view
Essays by user aangkasut :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...sciences than other subjects in school. However every subject has its own potential and...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the one hand, it is true that learning sciences as syllabus can improve a natio...
^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...cientist better in the next generation. it is also possibly that whenever the educ...
^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neglected to overcome the probability of country prosperousness. Additionally, it...
^^
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that if ecology city-system was applied , the infrastructure and urban living-sys...
^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...living-system would be approached well. moreover the multi-benefits may be obtained in e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: moreover,
...living-system would be approached well. moreover the multi-benefits may be obtained in e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 553, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...io-political and socio-economic fields. other considering is that the literature and ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 975, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l language of vernacular region but also it evokes the jargon in a country. ...
^^
Line 13, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...al financial and infrastructure growth. moreover, the whole, it can be reached as long a...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61066666667 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16307832796 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581333333333 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8212815594 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225899062071 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723588668335 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739934859097 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152135129314 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923404579135 0.056905535591 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.