Government should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choices. Others argue that it is their choice. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
One school of thought holds that the authorities should impose regulations about people’s food choices and nutrition; others are of the opinion that people should be free in terms of choosing what they eat. In this essay, I will scrutinize both views before concluding I agree with the latter.
On the one hand, it is understandable why other people acknowledge that the government should enforce laws about their citizens' nutritions and food choices. The key rationale is that by providing these laws, the individual’s overall wellbeing will be improved due to the addressing of health problems related to eating habits. For example, in today’s modern world, everyone, especially the young generation, are used to eating junk food which makes them easily vulnerable to obesity. If the government can prohibit food of this kind, the obesity rate can be reduced. Therefore, in the future, the new generations can be much healthier.
On the other hand, I side with those who say that eating food is a matter of personal choice. Firstly, the aforementioned proposal is an uphill task. Although it can still be executed, it must require a colossal amount of money and effort poured into it so of course it is not feasible in impoverished and developing countries whose budget is often meager. In addition to this, people should be given the leeway to eat whatever they want, provided that this action does not pose any threats to others. Therefore, if the choice of food does not jeopardize any lives or violate laws, it would be unjustifiable for the government to interfere with it.
In conclusion, while there is justification that people’s nutrition and food choices have to be controlled by the government, I would contend that people should be given autonomy regarding what they eat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-11 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 73 | view |
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required 78
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Everyday millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 56
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programs Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore concluding I agree with the latter. On the one hand, it is understandable wh...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s modern world, everyone, especially the young generation, are used to eating jun...
^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es them easily vulnerable to obesity. If the government can prohibit food of this...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09797297297 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84048902864 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2530257327 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271635560595 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898184319981 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972058133743 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18048927982 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596326151841 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.