The government should sometimes infringe on people's freedom for the security of society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Numerous people believe that the idea of infringing individual liberties is abhorrent. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that one's freedom can be violated by the government as a feasible approach to prevent potential dangers and to ensure the observation of safety regulations in society.
To begin with, it is an indisputable fact that intruding upon individual liberties is acceptable in light of the fact that it means to shield society from danger. It is vitally essential that the authority attempts to promote public privilege since there has been a climb in the crime rate, which goes with a plethora of risks. For example, according to recent research at airports around the world, they conduct security checks on people and their belongings. Although this seems intrusive at times, It is a feasible approach to prevent potential attacks from people.
Furthermore, interceding people's freedom right is to ensure the security regulations are followed strictly. A number of certain jobs may threaten the lives of a multitude of community if they are not responsible abundance. Take an instance of pilots and bus drivers, they must undergo a series of medical tests to ensure that they can be in charge of protecting their passengers while working. They ought to fly or drive numerous passengers daily, consequently they may put their passengers’ lives in jeopardy.
In conclusion, the government’s purpose of intruding on citizens’ private lives is to protect people from hazardous situations and to make sure safety regulations are abided. Therefore, governments should be admissible to infringe on the freedom of their people since they have the appropriate measures to guarantee society’s safety.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-27 | Vanhhhhhhh | 56 | view |
2023-07-13 | TL | 73 | view |
2023-07-13 | TL | 61 | view |
2022-07-27 | Vu Tuan Anh | 61 | view |
- The government should sometimes infringe on people s freedom for the security of society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The government should sometimes infringe on people s freedom for the security of society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41791044776 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03135761367 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59328358209 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4970977184 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172971973853 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640729353768 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058847601155 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108251109861 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051699731825 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.