The government should sometimes infringe on people s freedom for security of society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

The government should sometimes infringe on people’s freedom for security of society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Infringing one’s freedom for security was a topic of debate. Many people argue that authorities can not infringe on community privates. Personally, I completely agree that dwellers freedom should sometimes be infringed for safety of community.
To begin with, infringe on people’s liberties can be justified to protect people from danger. The crime rate is increased each year so that measures must be taken to prevent potential attack. Security in airport, for instance, security checks was mandatory provisions to protect people from harm. To get on plane, government will check people’s vali and their belongings to ensure that polices can identify who was potential crime. Therefore, it is undeniable that, in order ti improve the protection community, the state has to take an action even though they are infringing an individual privacy.
On top of that, government can violate one freedom to make sure that safety regulation are followed. In some circumstances, when rules are followed, it is easier for government to manage society. Certain jobs can endanger people life. It is vital to ensure that these employees follow safety rules even if their rights are infringed. Take an example of school bus drivers and pilot. If they are stress or use alcohol before their work, they can be perform their task safely. Consequently, they can make other parents or customers worried about their life.
To sum up, infringing on people's freedom is accepted if government protect society from threats. For these reason, imposing on individual freedom is sometimes necessary.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-27 Vanhhhhhhh 56 view
2023-07-13 TL 73 view
2023-07-13 TL 61 view
2022-07-27 Vu Tuan Anh 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dwellers'' or 'dweller's'?
Suggestion: dwellers'; dweller's
...es. Personally, I completely agree that dwellers freedom should sometimes be infringed f...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.332 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75136329844 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2593698948 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.4117647059 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7058823529 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259294989916 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890898695158 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826774394792 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195268344996 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987870443155 0.056905535591 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.