What type of infrastructure should be developed to ease public commute has become a topic of debate today. While some people believe rail services should be enhanced, others consider there is more need for road development. In this paper though it will agree with railways' acute fund requirement for better services, last mile connectivity to remote locations cannot be omitted.
Administration should peg more budget for locomotives because this transportation mode is reliable. railways, always have controlled movement of their rakes which gives them upper hand in designing their infrastructure deliberately. With the help of this careful construction this transport division usually results safer for commuters. For instance, in India daily 4 million people travel with railways, to attend their job on time, though they report zero fatalities. For this reason, it has become go-to option for public to travel and its further enhancement by more investment will surely be a good move towards mass movement.
Another motivation for preferring railways when it comes to investment is its lesser ticket charges. Although to develop this network it requires tremendous capital and return on period is also too long, to facilitate public to cut on their commute charges Mumbai local council often provides discounts for daily commuters. This way, I think people contain additional expenses that they need to shred out for daily travel to office. Furthermore, for long haulages also I have noticed that Indian railways share 53 percent of total ticket cost for lower class tickets. Consequently, poor can travel long distances easily with lesser amount.
However, despite acute need of funds for railways, development of road network cannot be neglected. To access remote locations such as hills, border regions and disputed zones between countries roads are key for connectivity, where train connectivity is not a viable option. Therefore, to reach last citizen of country roads are must.
In conclusion, I think, although funds allocation for rail network development should be prioritized, feasibility to connect remote individual of the country by road cannot be neglected. Government should therefore focus on coupled development of railways with roads.
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 11
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully.Others disagree. Discuss both views, and give you opinion. 73
- Some people consider price as most important thing to consider when buying a product such as a cell phone or a service e g medical treatment Do you agree or disagree 58
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people consider public libraries to be unnecessary due to the availability of information on the internet Others however believe that libraries can still play an important role in society Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Railways
...e this transportation mode is reliable. railways, always have controlled movement of the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52449567723 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85920502234 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613832853026 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0454430487 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158937041418 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569679106615 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406547468546 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936547173988 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361263997257 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.