While many people support the idea of disclosing un-offcial and personal details with their employer, many others say this has no purpose in office records. I consider, employer knowledge about employee's
pursuits, medical, family and other additional details are useful for organisation, job personnel as well as for the government, however, there are detrimental repercussions of it to be acknowledged.
On the one hand, it is often believed by many and I agree with this view that availibility of staff's personal details with their employment organisation beneftis both of them in several ways. One evident benefit is that, in case of health emergency such organisations can not only inform their family members within time but also share primary details with hospitals such as blood group, history of illness or allergies to get them prepared about patient's health and decide further prognosis. Furthermore, taxation is a crucial concern for majority of multinational company job holders. By maintaining this data on fingertips allow institutions both to maintain thier balance sheet in shape and ssecure their employee from any tax evasions. In addition to this federal govt, for instance, may help salaried people to avail various subsidies in home loan and in education loan by retrieving data from their employer.
On the other hand, many others opine disclosure of intimate data may lead them to potential antisocial threats. In Germany, last month, a russian hacker made banking data of various figures figures was made public starting from their chancellor to their country president. A later investigation surfaced that his source of information was govt records obtained by government at the time of thier deputation. Besides this, employer has to interact with his employee not his family members on daily basis, therefore this data collection becomes greek in this context.
In conclusion, although, there are few serious concerns over data disclosure, I think vast benefits produced by this act outweighs its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: figures
...ian hacker made banking data of various figures figures was made public starting from their cha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, may, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as to, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45283018868 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86359045789 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632075471698 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2685580137 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.9166666667 7.06120827912 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227124035156 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787387967694 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435514017197 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117803293889 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556936226882 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.