It is widely believed that the government should allocate their budget with a view to tackling with pressing social concerns rather than exploring universe. From my perspective, I partly agree with this school of thought because of the significant importance of both aspects mentioned above.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why people contend with the idea of investing more money in addressing public issues. This is mainly because the overall living conditions of citizens are not guaranteed. Despite the outstanding development of science and technology, the co-existence of social problems such as traffic congestion, crime, and fatal diseases is regarded as the most enormous anxiety for the welfare of the community. Unless these problems are solved rapidly and coincidentally, the government can not meet the basic demand of all inhabitants, which is likely to numerous serious consequences in the long term. For example, during the covid-19 pandemic, thanks to the successful cooperation of multi-governments and the world health organization through a gigantic international funding, the negative impacts of this disease can be controlled and prevented. As a result, people might easily abreast the normal rhythm of life and the global economic can go back with the same growth rate with the absence of the world-level pandemic.
On the other hand, besides spending more money on social purposes, I strongly agree that the governmental expenditure on discovering terrestrial life is absolutely reasonable. Firstly, because of the worldwide population explosion, along with the soaring consuming demand of people, the natural resources are increasingly exhausted. Moreover, the majority of such resources are unlimited and unrenewable, the environment will be suffered from various heavy damage from the over-explosion and overuse of people. Secondly, the data collected from other planets can be a valuable information source for the purpose of seeking new alternative resources as well as forecasting the natural phenomenon happening in the world. For instance, the knowledge resulting from the Moon can be applied for weather forecast field. Therefore, people have the best preparation for the appearance of numerous annual bloods and volcanoes to limit the devastation in terms of property and live.
In conclusion, for the sake of people in the future, the government ought to effectively allocate their budget regarding both public problems and universal investment.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, incidentally, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60317460317 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07129526801 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7161171769 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.2 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182617383191 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567327478816 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733853206447 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10167322738 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269233400496 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.