Governments give a lot of support to artists, eventhough some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some argue that a large of support of the states is given to artists is reasonable, while others share a thought that is a waste and there is somewhere more needed. Although I understand that investing to the art is for a long term goal, the money should be used for emergency areas with the most iconic is health.
Art plays an important role in our lives and the governments spend out much cash on them is fully understandable. This is used for encouraging the youngers to pay more attention to the art and follow them in professional way. In a wider vision, value of art works can be uncountable and heired from many generations. This is the reason why even a small country like Vietnam still holds on many contests like dancing, singing, painting and so on for all ages. This is a huge push for someone who is afraid of chasing their way to be a profession. However, I still believe that the artists just need a support at the early of their period and the governments should take an eye more to somewhere specific like health.
Despite the fact that health is treated quite well, investment to it is still more urgent thanh the art one. Every citizen pays taxes and follows the law for having a better life standard but they always face up out of dated facilities times by times. An individual who pay Healthcare Insurance in many years have to wait for a long time to have a general health check and if he or she wants to speed up this process, choose VIP service with extra fees is the best option. As the result, people in developing countries like Vietnam hate going to the hospitals, so sometimes it’s sorry to know that some situations could have been treated sooner. I, therefore, believe that health is such an iconic example for governments to know that they should spend the taxes in emergent areas rather than the art.
In conclusion, although helping the artists chase their ways and create impressive works that could be viewed in far future, the states need to take consideration to somewhere more needed like health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | duonanh | 77 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | scorpiothienhat | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | scorpiothienhat | 78 | view |
| 2015-09-19 | Justin | 80 | view |
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 73
- More and more people in developing countries are purchasing cars for the first time What problems does this cause What do you think is a possible solution 61
- Task 2 The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries particularly developing countries What are the causes of such hunting What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries 84
- Governments give a lot of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many students choose to study at colleges and universities that are far away from the places where they grew up Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n to somewhere more needed like health.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50753639809 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550684931507 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.3772892025 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116269069357 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408222325877 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402691338886 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775280556318 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248666179362 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.