Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings. This money should be used for providing new housing and road development. Do you agree or disagree.
Preservation of old buildings forces metropolitan authorities to spend tremendous financial resources. Some individuals suggest that this source of investment should be allocated to the construction of new houses and streets. Personally, I disagree with the notion because old buildings are of significant importance. Thus, there should be two flows of money to invest in both categories.
On the one hand, old buildings play an essential role in the urban settings. In fact, as they were constructed a long time ago, they would possess some unique architectural features in their structures and interior landscapes that no modern-built complexes could have. Therefore, governments must allocate resources to restore them in order to maintain their cultural values. Besides, these special details make them lucrative tourist attractions that should not be missed by visitors. The given explanations justify the reason that old buildings are worthy of the allotment of money.
On the other hand, new plans to develop the housing and roads are critical to counter the transformation in cosmopolitan areas’ population. In fact, following the globalization and the development of technology, there is a huge surge in migration patterns, resulting in an influx of rural people to large cities. Therefore, more buildings are necessary to facilitate the need of people for accommodation. Also, this phenomenon requires more roads to make it easier for commuting and traveling. In addition, coupling with the large numbers of people decided to live in cities is the financial resources that they generate, so governments should collect money to develop new housing and road schemes in the form of tax and toll.
To conclude, despite the government's practice of allocating money to preserve old buildings, I endorse the hypothesis that there should be separated sources to help develop them simultaneously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-01 | @hoangnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | @hoangnguyen | 84 | view |
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transports To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- People believe that children commit crimes should be punished Others think parents should be punished instead Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Instead of requiring primary school students to do experiments themselves schools should only allow them to watch experiments demonstrated by teachers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Museum and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts of the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53082191781 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13125897879 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5266474961 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324115738323 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959389599907 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462648560612 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179154026451 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536942215211 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.