Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the recent years, whether public sectors or private ones should be responsible for the advancement of sciences has sparked a heated debate. While some people argue that the former should be in charge of the task, other people object to the argument. I personally believe, however, that it would depend on the discipline.
On the one hand, it is preferable that governments take responsibility for the improvement of some specific scientific fields like humanities. It is difficult for such fields to gain research funds from commercial organisations because these fields hardly deliver financial benefit. In Japan, for example, the number of research funds established by private sectors for humanities is far less than the one for natural sciences. If public sectors as represented by governments do not financially aid to these disciplines, they will perish sooner or later. Indeed, in some countries, it is reported that the number of faculty of humanities is especially decreasing compared to the other faculties because of the shortage of funds.
On the other hand, commercial organisations should be responsible for the development of their relevant practical sciences. These organisations usually enjoy some sort of benefit from the disciplines in one way or another; technology and knowledge as the research outcomes of these fields are indispensable for the prosperity of private companies. One of the best examples of this is pharmaceutical industry. Today, most part of their profit heavily relies upon drug discovery efforts conducted by pharmaceutical colleges around the world. Therefore, it is very natural that private sectors provide research budgets for practical sciences. This is also evidenced in a today’s movement in which a number of enterprises are embarking on financial backing for their related fields as a kind of pro bono activities.
In conclusion, the answer to the question whether governments or commercial organisations are responsible for scientific researches would be contingent on the scientific field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-26 | vylam | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-16 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | ivantran | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-05 | mayank2212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | el-naz | 78 | view |
- Nowadays media should include more good news in their publications Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 91
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world. However, people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy, solar energy and so on. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Why? 78
- School and university students learn lessons far better from their teachers than from other sources such as the Internet and television To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
- Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 30, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...vities. In conclusion, the answer to the question whether governments or commercial organisations...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53333333333 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15459408558 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4795696068 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264185267963 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895410370512 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763123214053 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18033103464 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445126245325 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.