The governments should invest more money in science education rather than subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an opinion that it is better for countries to invest a significant amount of money in science education more than other subjects. However, there are also many vital subjects about which students need to learn.
It cannot deny that science and technological developments have substantially changed human life positively as these allow us to live conveniently and comfortably. Thus, if governments allocate a significant amount budget for science education, the living standards for each person can be continued to improve. Besides, generally, a breakthrough technological innovation tends to strengthen national revenues significantly. In America, since the Apple company has released the unique and exceptional smartphones in society, the US's income has experienced remarkable economic growth. Therefore, many governments consider investing a high proportion of money in science instructions due to such potential changes.
However, governments should encourage students to learn various subjects as many as possible. It is because studying different subjects could bring about more favourable results for students in the long run. In detail, as many pupils are educated about humanity and social science studies, many of them are more likely to broaden their horizons by gaining in-depth knowledge and theoretical information comprehensively, which give rise to creativity and inspiration. According to some research, they are more inclined to access more flexible and unique approaches to appreciate works of art compared with their counterparts. Aside from that, having different educational lessons allow students to discover their talents and skills more usefully.
In conclusion, I cannot entirely agree with the idea that governments should invest their capital tremendously in science lectures only because there are more essential subjects which improve students' developments extensively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95652173913 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13070315543 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1194273651 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.461538462 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258070365235 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865805081181 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715872370301 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172313642441 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541263817112 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.