Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree

Transportation plays a crucial role in national economical development. By a smooth flow of delivery, the products can come to customers quickly and effectively. There are some modes of transport. Recently, there is a question that whether governments should lessen the investment on roads to spend on railways instead. There are some matters if they actually do that as below.
By the time, road has been considered as the most flexible and convenient route with reasonable price. It can easily be imagined by the successive enormous amount of vehicles moving from place to place on the roads everyday. Motorbikes, cars, trucks are that most common means of transport of residents and everyone who wants to go outside needs to use the road. Meanwhile, there are not so many railways routes in the world, which means it is not a popular mode of transport compared to roads. This is understandable because of its long waiting and transporting time. The average speed is very slow along with the fact that not everybody owns the rail, which means after getting tickets, passengers have to wait until departure time and it also takes ages to arrive destinations. In businesses, we rarely see shippers choose railways as a mere route, except for big numbers of cargo or having multimodal transport.
So should governments spend on railways. Although railways have less advantages in general, it must depend on the strategy of each country and geographical factors to make decision. In case some nations are willing to expand the railways routes and it is in appropriate positions to invest, they can completely pour budget into their projects.
In conclusion, the choice could be able to make in according to thecharacteristics of each mode of transport or the nation objectives.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...tation plays a crucial role in national economical development. By a smooth flow of delive...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...moving from place to place on the roads everyday. Motorbikes, cars, trucks are that most...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun advantages is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...end on railways. Although railways have less advantages in general, it must depend o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, so, while, except for, in conclusion, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09246575342 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94788624413 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5305100317 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9375 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137295914315 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498214309137 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075222336968 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.082333813246 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579639422739 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.