Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some hold the opinion that government authorities should allocate funds on operating trains instead of roadway transportation. I partially agree with this statement as railway can transport maximum people and even cargos, and offers cheaper modes of transportation. Likewise, roads provide access to every shorter-distance region where railway is not possible.
Investment in railways seems to be expensive, however, in long run it is far more beneficial. This mode not only provides faster approach to transportation but also is cheaper. Having capacity to hold greater number of people and cargo, it equips people and even business to expand in their services, which results in balanced development of a nation. For instance, if not for trains, India - having highest rail network would not be able to speed up its development in this shorter span of time..
Similarly, roadway also has its own importance without which there would not be access to transportation where railway could not be constructed. It is not even possible to connect every house with rall networks, for this roadways would be major source of transportation. So, short distance travelling that requires frequent movement must be covered by roadways. Feasible access to roadways also develops every corner because with this medium other developmental of infrastructures is possible.
To conclude, railway is faster and is reliably cheaper to transfer people and product, whereas, roadway can provide access to every corner where trains lack services, I believe, governments should balance the investment n these networks as they have unique and are more important in the development of any region.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The internet is a great source of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world Is all information reliable on the internet What could be done to control information online 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
...or instance, if not for trains, India - having highest rail network would not be able to speed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...development in this shorter span of time.. Similarly, roadway also has its own ...
^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ect every house with rall networks, for this roadways would be major source of trans...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, similarly, so, whereas, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47876447876 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03502970751 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602316602317 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9978224645 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139886777116 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559152682852 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456970234262 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966037980898 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621892903301 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.