Governments should spend money in railways rather than roads.
The claim that government should spend money on railways rather than roads is an eccentric concept, because it totally depends on the situation and the purpose the investment will serve. To decide this, government will have to conduct a detailed investigation whether railways require more money than roads or the other way around.
Roads and railways are two of the most important aspects of transportation system. People and goods use both roads and railways everyday. They are both equally important. However, in some cases, one requires more attention than the other. If the road condition of a country is worst than railways, and it is having a huge impact in its’ population and economy, then the government should spend more money in improving road conditions rather than railways. In many countries roads are the main mean of everyday transport , for both people and goods.
Railways are important method of transport too. In some countries, railways are the main medium of transport. In a city like Tokyo, where railway is a the major mean for transport, it is more important to improve the railway system. New York City has its’ subway, which is an important method of transport for the inhabitants there. So in these cases government should probably spend more money in railways rather than roads. In some places, even if roads are more important than railways, the roads may not always meet the demand. For that, spending more money in railways could be a viable option in order to improve both the road and railway condition.
So to conclude, it cannot be generalized whether government should spend money in railways or roads. To reach that decision, situations have to be scrutinized by experts, so that a better solution can be achieved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Thanh Phong B2407053 | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | Ngô Quốc Thắng | 56 | view |
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems 87
- chinese urban expenditure 78
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 67
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 61
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e and goods use both roads and railways everyday. They are both equally important. Howev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: WORST_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse'?
Suggestion: worse
.... If the road condition of a country is worst than railways, and it is having a huge ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... are the main mean of everyday transport , for both people and goods. Railways ...
^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
... In a city like Tokyo, where railway is a the major mean for transport, it is more im...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
... for the inhabitants there. So in these cases government should probably spend more m...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ways meet the demand. For that, spending more money in railways could be a viable...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06849315068 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66244856591 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489726027397 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0980718682 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0588235294 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41176470588 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451145982137 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161774265104 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.185282276358 0.0667982634062 277% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309139194682 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725159158194 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.