Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In the cutting-edge era, it is a very popular statement that high authorities should use more money on making railways in spite of roads. I am largely agree with notion due to many reasons. This essay will shed light on valid Stand-point in favor of my opinion in the subsequent paragraphs.
In the contemporary scenario, most of the people prefer to travel by the trains because of several causes. The predominant one is the saving of time. To elaborate it, it is a very obvious that all individuals have very busy schedule and they believe to hike here and there very fastly. For instance, it is vividly clear from the survey that was conducted in UK in last year that majority of masses used to commute by trains for their daily jobs. Hence, it can be said that public mostly believe to travel by railways.
I would like to add some more points in order to bolster mine opine that why regime should take a considerable look on railways. The second cardiac reason is rocket increase in the accidents on roads by private vehicles and public busses. To explicate it, it is manifested that accidents are escalate rapidly owing to elevated traffic jams. To epitome, the headline of famous newspaper 'The Moscow times' revealed that nortality rate went up surprisingly from few past years mainly due to road accidents. Hence,law makers should make more railways so that road accidents can go down and people would visit through trains.
To conclude, it is crystal clear from the essay that Government should spend majority of money on railways in order to save time of society and reduce the death ratio due to road accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ailways in spite of roads. I am largely agree with notion due to many reasons. This e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'escalated'.
Suggestion: escalated
...it, it is manifested that accidents are escalate rapidly owing to elevated traffic jams....
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that nortality rate went up surprisingly from few past years mainly due to road a...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , law
...ears mainly due to road accidents. Hence,law makers should make more railways so tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, second, so, for instance, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78368794326 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53353594529 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1540401302 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3571428571 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172048403664 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488095097183 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658688092325 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11236400434 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073470831437 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.