the graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The given line graph illustrates the percentage of recycled materials namely, paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics in a specific nation between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, the percentage of recycled material for paper and cardboard increased sustainable with ups down then starts falling after an eight years period, whereas in glass containers declined significantly within an eight years period then inclined steadily in the same- recorded period.
Around 65% of paper and cardboard was recycled in 1982. Then, it went up to 80% with little fluctuation from 1980 to 1992. After that, it start decline ceaselessly until 2010. The recycle rate of glass containers were fell significantly from 50% to 40% between 1982 and 1988, respectively. This figure then rose steadily to reach 60% in last year.
The percentages of aluminum cans started being recycled in 1982, while plastics were being recycled in 1988. There were gradual increase in aluminum cans from 1982 to 2010 and reach to around 35%. The rate of recycled plastics inclined slightly from 5% to 10% until the end year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-14 | pawan966@722 | 56 | view |
- The charts and the pie show the number of students at university in a particular European country, the government's annual spending on each student between 1984 and 2009, and the percentages of students' economic family background. 78
- The line graph shows the number of people who moved from four European countries to the United States of America. 73
- Most people accept that we now live in globalized world but not everyone agrees that this is beneficial. To what extent is globalization a positive or negative development? 84
- The charts and the pie show the number of students at university in a particular European country the government s annual spending on each student between 1984 and 2009 and the percentages of students economic family background 65
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local language. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local l 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ose steadily to reach 60% in last year. The percentages of aluminum cans started...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27528089888 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63736970766 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 176.041082164 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 506.74238477 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.2567434486 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23160732843 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10402968535 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642742718287 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154272608558 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692861633238 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.