With the increasing demand for energy sources such as oil and gas should people be looking for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas

In recent years, there has been a growing concern about energy shortage. This has led to the suggestion that people should look for gasoline in some desolate places. However, it is unwise to follow this advice as the drawbacks of this decision outweigh its benefits.
Admittedly, there are some advantages accruing from extracting oil in uncharted places. For instance, if a company initiates an oil exploitation project in Northwest Territories, it definitely stimulates the local economy. This is because its huge investment is sure to generate more job opportunities such as accounting, engineering, catering business and communication. With more local residents being hired from that company, they have more incomes, and part of them will be spent on the consumption of goods or other services, thereby developing a prosperous living place.
Despite the above benefits, there are also some disadvantages of finding crude oil from faraway areas. Pollution is the first price people need to pay for this action. Two decades ago, for example, an oil spill occurred in the Gulf of Mexico during the exploitation of oil. This incident resulted in water and air pollution in that place. With a large amount of unrefined oil being spilled over the surface of the ocean, tons of heavy metal and toxic substances devastated the wildlife habitats, particularly those animals living around the waters. This severe contamination wreaked havoc on the marine ecosystem. Worse still, it was reported that some people got poisoned after eating those polluted sea animals such as fish, shrimps, oysters and crabs.
Considering the irrecoverable impacts of pollution, I would argue that the drawbacks of extracting fossil fuels in remote and unexplored locations surpass the benefits. Although this measure might boost the local economy, the negative repercussions are harmful to both people and the ecosystem.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, still, for example, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39730639731 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85907163346 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639730639731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4902118593 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274994092499 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779311436432 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040287973307 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143334818401 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580486128354 0.056905535591 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.