So prevalent is cutthroat business culture that workplace has become synonymous with unfair treatment and exploitation. Confronted with this take-no-prisoners predicament, a growing number of people are discussing how to improve workplace culture. One of their suggestions is that companies should embrace equality in the workplace and grant all eligible employees the same number of vacation leave annually. In my opinion, I completely subscribe to this idea to a large extent for two reasons.
To begin with, providing all staff with the same number of holidays helps them maintain equilibrium in mental, physical and emotional health. Although opponents of this measure contend the number of vacation days should vary according to the corporate hierarchy, they should not overlook the fact that all workers, regardless of their positions, are human beings who need sufficient time off to relax and rejuvenate. Temporarily unplugging from the work-related stresses is of paramount importance to workers since employee burnout can give rise to a health hazard. For example, a semiconductor company is reported to have mistreated and exploited its employees. In contrast to the senior managers who were privileged to have at least 96-day annual vacation days, the production line laborers were only eligible for 80 hours of holidays per year. Worse still, they worked for more than twelve hours consecutively every day. This unfair treatment finally led to the physical and mental collapse of the workers with some of them ending their abject misery by committing suicide.
In addition, equal access to vacation leave plays an important role in boosting employee morale and corporate images, both of which help strengthen a company’s solidarity. On the one hand, a well-established welfare policy not only gives workers a chance to feel fully recharged but also fosters a positive workplace culture where all people are equally valued. Working in an employee-friendly environment, people are willing to show more dedication and loyalty to their company. Their active attitude might also increase productivity and efficiency in work. On the other hand, there are some advantages accruing from the implementation of the equal days of holidays. First, a reasonable vacation policy can greatly enhance a company’s reputation. Second, companies that put a premium on equality in the workplace are more likely to retain top employees and attract talented people to join the work team.
To recapitulate, the idea that all staff is provided with the same number of vacations is absolutely acceptable. Not only does this equal treatment secure employees’ physical and mental health but it also maximizes a company’s benefits. Hence, this employee-friendly policy should be promoted.
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 95
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every way. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they would be given more time to do whatever they want 90
- Young people have attitude and ideas different from that of their parents and grandparents How do these attitudes differ between young people and their parents and grandparents In your opinion do you think it would cause problems 78
- Some people believe that longer prison sentences are the best way to decrease crime while others believe that there are alternative ways to decrease crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, look, second, so, still, then, well, at least, for example, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2369.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53504672897 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13214071925 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3439115799 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.80952381 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270856148428 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775600410474 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708391513446 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178682226699 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333876366302 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.