There has been a surge in a number of individuals, who believe that animal ought to be treated fairly and should not be abused; however, a faction asserts that people must utilize animals in different ways to satisfy their some requirements such as food and testing for medicinal discovery. This dubious argument will be scrutinized before concluding my opinion.
On the one hand, people who support peaceful animal co-existence have gamut of reasons to argue. The foremost on is, exploiting animals for human desire is an unethical practice. Human has no moral right to hunt and sacrifice animals to fulfil their essential needs. For example food, skins, and to make other utensils. With incorporation of modern technology, an alternative options exist that can be proven fruitful than animal derived product. In this planet, every species have right to live harmonically, same as human beings. Therefore, certain type of execution of animals and experimenting them for drug invention should be prohibited. Apart from this, the philosophy of animals’ right protection not only nurture love, care, and humanity amongst many but also preserve some of the animal species to be extinct by maintaining ecosystem.
On the other hand, people with counter view point have multiple assertion. Firstly, it is a mean of livelihood for many individuals. Number of people are rely solely on animal related business and for them it becomes incumbent to utilize animals for different purpose. Secondly, replacing some animal species with humans for research could have devastating consequences including life risk, which could be avoided by keeping animals for testing before mankind. For instance, many scientific experimentation conducted on mice or guinea-pig has revealed some unknown facts which, otherwise, could have caused a serious implication on direct human application. Lastly, man are thought to be above the herbivores in food chain. Hence, it was asserted as their right to eat and explore by many.
In conclusion, although there are a split opinion regarding animal exploitation for various human purposes, I opine that animals should be preserved against certain illegal practices and have a definite right to co-exist. Nevertheless, for some perilous drug discovery animal testing should be conducted cautiously and ethically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al ought to be treated fairly and should not be abused; however, a faction assert...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tial needs. For example food, skins, and to make other utensils. With incorporati...
^^
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... protection not only nurture love, care, and humanity amongst many but also prese...
^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...humanity amongst many but also preserve some of the animal species to be extinct by maintai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for many individuals. Number of people are rely solely on animal related busine...
^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun experimentation seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much scientific experimentation', 'a good deal of scientific experimentation'.
Suggestion: much scientific experimentation; a good deal of scientific experimentation
...r testing before mankind. For instance, many scientific experimentation conducted on mice or guinea-pig has rev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47790055249 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88231175808 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5454844083 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.368421053 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1578947368 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440779331288 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130728303523 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698525844409 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284091721648 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028112242556 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.