Residing in a nation where communication through non-native language is necessary; however, it brings social as well as reasonable issues. According to my inclination, I, to a large extent agree with this argument. My viewpoint along with justification is explained further.
Justifying my opinion, the most relevant argument is that while doing conversation in a non-native language, initially its difficult to understand the accent and meaning of the message the other person wants to convey. Due to not having enough language proficiency, lack of vernacular awareness and differences in accent individuals failed to deliver the message they want to indicate. For example, there is a vast variation between the native and overseas speakers. In addition to this, Cultural difference and mentality difference is also playing vital role in thought understanding.
Furthermore, Learning new dialect in a short time of span is not an easy task. To justify, During talking in foreign language people usually take longer time to response because to they convert words into their native language. Last but not the least, due to thought as well as upbringing differences they cannot able communicate better because they have less topic to discuss.
However, I counter claim with the mentioned perspective. To commence with, adapting foreign culture brings two nationality closer. As world is a global village therefore people tend to communicate with each other. Beside this, its make person socially aware and broad-minded.
In conclusion, the speaking of non-native language can cause detrimental effect on person’s mentality. As cultural differences and initial suffer due to accent and less awareness of language can cause negative impact to individual, whereas merits is better job perspective and getting information about new culture and their dialect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, speaking of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60777385159 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03338728154 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625441696113 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5383915989 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14386410022 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042060189287 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529330444092 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779617045995 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042623254513 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.