A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
The question of whether to use animals for different purposes has always sparked heated debates. While some believe that these actions are considered as animal exploitation, and must be stopped, others think that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. In this essay, I will explain both sides by using examples from real world experience and add my personal opinion in the end.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that killing or torturing animals is extremely cruel and unacceptable. Unfortunately, these have been seen frequently in social media; putting a cat inside a microwave and burnt it alive; cutting dog’s tail for fun. Those horrid and evil actions must definitely be banned and tracked those heartless people for punishment. Therefore, after looking at these examples, it is clear why exploiting animals is refuted by many groups.
On the other hand, animals are really vital for scientific experiments and as a source of food. For example, in the 1950s, it was a medical breakthrough when polio vaccine was invented; and saved million of children globally. Without these experimental species, the life on earth will be extinct. In addition, many people rely on animals as a main dish in many days. Thus, it is clear that there are extraordinary benefits of employing animals for humans’ needs.
To conclude, both arguments have their points of supporting or refusing animal exploitation. However, although I firmly believe in animals’ usage: it protects from diseases, and provide human beings food; killing or slicing them to satisfy people’s desire is definitely wrong and it should be banned. Finally, if, in the future, animals are used in research and scientific field, many chronic illnesses will be treated soon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether to use animals for different purposes h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...s from real world experience and add my personal opinion in the end. On the one hand, it is u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... medical breakthrough when polio vaccine was invented; and saved million of child...
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... polio vaccine was invented; and saved million of children globally. Without these exp...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...otects from diseases, and provide human beings food; killing or slicing them to satisf...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30465949821 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86487793755 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637992831541 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8438589192 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332467123584 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997742636163 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567229266539 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191240586486 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495833898024 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.