Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some proponents indicate that nations should bring historical objects back to their original places. Personally, I totally agree with this opinion because historical figures could be displayed for educational purposes, and they are significant evidence for the history of each nation.
To begin with, those objects are firm evidence for each period in the history of those countries. Bringing them back to their origin could therefore provide the people in those nations the insight of real events that actually happened in the past. Their heroic history, therefore, would never be forgotten and could become well known not only to them but also foreign friends who come to visit.
Another reason is museums in countries of the historical objects’ origin could display them to educate the local people and visitors, especially small children. They could provide more background information of each object to highlight the features and historical meaning of them. Guns that dated back to the Vietnamese war, for instance, are displayed in many museums across Vietnam, each of them has their own stories and deliver several meaningful messages. Those historical figure could be an interesting source for students to study the history of their people. As they are objects that could be seen and touch in reality instead of boring texts in history books, youngsters would find it more interesting to absorb the knowledge by looking at real guns or bullets. Furthermore, changing the location to study, from schools to museums, could motivate students to focus on the lessons since it gives them a sense of adventure.
In conclusion, I agree that historical figures should be brought back to their original nations because they are proves of the history of each country and have educational meaning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-19 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Phạm Phương Uyên | 78 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these view and give 78
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The chart shows the depth of snow in a particular ski resort 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2787456446 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59585389215 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554006968641 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3377828832 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22841701962 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967093787838 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560544493041 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166585026684 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496447937607 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.