Human activity has had a negative impact on the environment and animals around the world. Some people think this can not be changed. While others believe actions can be taken to bring about change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
An enormous amount of revenue has been made from human activities all across the world. However, it’s a half blade knife, given the fact that many repercussions related to the environment have been caused. Therefore, some people believe it’s time to make a big change to secure the freshness of the environment. Nevertheless, others hold the point of view that no actions could modify this problem. This essay will be illustrating both viewpoints and my opinion will be backed with specific examples.
First of all, it is without a doubt that the annual revenues from human-involved activities are incredibly high. Research shows it has been generating billions of dollars for us and becoming an inevitable part of the economy. So, a cessation of human activities is seemingly impossible because it will affect workers and investors all around the world in terms of how much money they can make, and not everyone can accept this cost. Besides, given the fact that it requires an exorbitant cost of making nature-risks-free factories and most companies’ leaders aim to minimize their production costs to maximize the final revenues. Therefore, it’s really hard if not today impossible to interfere in their own businesses.
On the other hand, many people, especially nature-lovers agree that it’s time to change. They strongly believe that governments can take part in industry-reform, by using their ultimate power to urge companies to change the method of producing or exploiting. Also, governments can announce new legislation against companies who didn't comply with all the environment-friendly requirements. In addition, as long as people are working together to fix the same problem, nothing can be achieved and therefore, the human impact on the environment will no longer be a threat.
In my perspective, I think we need to accept the reality that we could not survive without hurting the environment because any profitable activities will need natural resources to be generated. For example, the fashion industry will disappear if the government condemns them for exploiting wild animal’s skin. However, I absolutely believe that people should consider all the expenses before proceeding, it means as long as the impact on earth is not too considerable or noticeable then it’s totally acceptable for them to keep running their business. Last but definitely not least, the government should take the initiative in the process of solving nature-associated problems. Because it’s also their responsibility to keep the earth safe and clean.
All in all, the wounded environment is an inevitable part of our current industrialized society. However, people and government can still work together to cease the impact of human activities on mother nature. From my perspective, we couldn't change the whole industry just in a blink of an eye, therefore, we need to learn how to solve each problem together and step by step. Overall, everything is still in our hands so we should proceed now before it’s too late to act.
- Some educationalists think that international exchange visits will benefit teenagers at school To what extent advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 73
- NOWADAYS MANY parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a positive and negative development 73
- Some people think that we cannot learn the qualities of truly successful people at any universities or institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea 67
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve crime Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e new legislation against companies who didnt comply with all the environment-friendl...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... mother nature. From my perspective, we couldnt change the whole industry just in a bli...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, then, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2563.0 1615.20841683 159% => OK
No of words: 485.0 315.596192385 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28453608247 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07745755963 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 176.041082164 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544329896907 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3034715763 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.434782609 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0869565217 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258951827053 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652398803001 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062819484258 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14608609776 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715521462653 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.