Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think this cannot be changed, while others believe action can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Undoubtedly, natural environment severely affected around the globe by industrialization and modernization. These human activities have had worse effect on plats and animals. Some voices believe that it is impossible to change the worse effect on flora and fauna while others think that some positive steps should be taken to reduce this negative development. In my opinion by taking some positive steps that could help to recover the damage which caused by human activities.
On the one hand, millions of tons waste and hazardous gas released in the water, land, and air by the manufacturing companies. Consequently, the climate is getting warmer day by day due to the global warming effect. Plants and many endangered species cannot survive in the high temperature. For instance, Alaskan glaciers melting day by day because of rise in temperature, therefore, a polar bear cannot survive without extreme cold weather and now this wild animal have become near to complete extinction. Furthermore, some people hunt wild animals for money. To explain, hunters illegally hunt wild species like lions, elephants, and many more, these people sell animal’s various body parts such as nails, skins, teeth any many more and sell in a market with huge money price.
On the other hand, people who think there are positive steps should have taken to reduce further damage. Firstly, government could create more parks and forest to preserve the natural plants and wildlife animals and make rules and regulations for complete restriction on human activity near those aeras. Furthermore, government should increase the zoo breeding program to reduce the extinction of rare plants and animals. For example, Amur leopard has close to wiped out in Asian countries. However, in 1985 the government started the breeding process in zoos, now more than 700 leopards exist in worldwide. In addition, the government must prohibit the hunting of wildlife and birds and imposing strict punishment for violating the rules.
In conclusion, global warming and hunting that cause a negative impact on plants and animals, to reduce these negative developments government must punish hunters, increase the zoo breeding program and create more jungles and parks.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-09-10 | Mahesh0411 | 84 | view |
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think this cannot be changed while others believe action can be taken to bring about a change Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that it is valuable for society to experiment with bacteria and viruses while others feel this is dangerous and should not be done Discuss both views and give your own opinion Use examples and explanations from your own knowledge to su 97
- Doctors agree that for a long, healthy life people need to do at least 20 minutes of cardiovascular exercise, whereby the increase their heart-rate such as running or swimming even though most people know this, they do not do regular cardiovascular activi 100
- Nowadays most parents have to go on official tours Therefore they spend a lot of time away from their family What are the effects of this trend for the parents who go on tours and the rest of the family 73
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer countries However the governments of richer countries take more responsibility of helping the take more responsibility for helping poorer nations in such aeras 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mage which caused by human activities. On the one hand, millions of tons waste ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'developments'' or 'development's'?
Suggestion: developments'; development's
...s and animals, to reduce these negative developments government must punish hunters, increas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gram and create more jungles and parks.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70439624302 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576704545455 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1879569409 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.529411765 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2352941176 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206845830258 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594670003824 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696379374525 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121573166403 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825595694342 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.