Over the past few decades, it has been rigorous for plants and animals to adapt to the condition on the Earth due to the impacts stemming from human’s activities. While many people find it impossible to improve, others believe in its likelihood of change. Personally, I agree with the second statement and will support this view after discussing both opinions.
On the one hand, individuals against the possibility of improvement justify that these bad influences were exerted by inevitable activities. Indeed, the rising population presents an enormous demand for essential infrastructure for accommodation or healthcare. This leads to the massive construction, releasing an excessive load of particulate matters and restrain species’ respiratory system. Another cause of negative effects can be found in intensive industrial production, the outcome of which is not only economic growth but also many environmental drawbacks: contamination of harmful gases (SO2, NOx) causes acid rain; the needs of space for factories cause deforestation and loss of natural cohabitation of species.
On the other hand, it is believed that effective measures can be taken to alleviate these effects. First, the advancement of innovative technology facilitates the utilization of alternative energy, which is less detrimental for plants and animals, compared to fossil fuel, thanks to lower amount of released harmful substances. Second, the authority is also responsible for this mission. Particularly, policies are also of great use in preventing species from destruction, as we see in Canada, which saw a considerable decline in number of seal hunters after the seal clothes prohibition in Europe came into effect.
In brief, when not disavowing that the impacts upon plants and animals are unavoidable, I believe that human activities can be modified to minimize them and assure sustainable lives for all species.
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (e.g: environment, cost). Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 10
- Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s view after discussing both opinions. On the one hand, individuals against the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss of natural cohabitation of species. On the other hand, it is believed that e...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rohibition in Europe came into effect. In brief, when not disavowing that the i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sure sustainable lives for all species.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62413793103 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16817745633 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675862068966 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1831678594 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.916666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199055330684 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701639911623 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706465537024 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130988526266 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651071916862 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.