IELTS Writing Task 2: Some People Work For The Same Organization All Their Working Life. Others Think That It Is Better To Work For Different Organizations. Discuss Both These Views And Give Your Own Opinion.

In the corporate world, some professionals tend to work for the same employer during their entire career, whereas others frequently switch the workplaces and believe that diversified experience gained through working with multiple companies is more beneficial. In my view, working with multiple companies gives the working class a competitive advantage over others.

Generally speaking, there are a number of reasons that motivate staff to pursue their career with the same company. Perhaps the main reason why people are in favor of persistently staying in one company is because it gives them financial stability. Long term employees normally accrue financial benefits and handsome pension plans. For instance, public sector companies in the Middle East offers lifetime pension to the employees who work for them for over 15 years. Another reason why people opt to work for one company is job security. It is quite uncommon for companies to make their employees redundant who have served them for a considerable long time.

On the other hand, people working for a variety of companies are given more opportunities to learn different skills. These workers hone their skillset to the level that is needed to progress to the senior positions such as CEO and CFO. It is evident from the fact that top executives of fortune 100 global companies posses working experience of multiples business sectors. Moreover, in the time of economic recession, there are higher chances of employability for those who have worked in different sectors.

In conclusion, long service with a company offers financial benefit and job security but in order to grow to senior positions, it is mandatory to have work exposure of different industrial sectors.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'offers'' or 'offer's'?
Suggestion: offers'; offer's
...lic sector companies in the Middle East offers lifetime pension to the employees who w...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32608695652 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73209548253 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9622787064 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321261912744 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123802390885 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763852847121 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200475682802 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748920271522 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.