Important historical objects in museums around the world should be returned to their country of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that historically important objects being showcased in different countries ought to be returned to their country of origin. Personally, I agree with this idea because these items are of significance to their rightful owners in terms of history.
One of the prominent concerns surrounding the return of historical objects to their “homeland” is the absence of proper facilities for preservation. International museums in developed countries, such as London Museum, are known for their high levels of security and preserving capabilities. This is due to the fact these museums are well-funded by the authorities of the wealthy countries, which means the historical relics or structures are not only being constantly monitored but also well-preserved in proper conditions. These challenging tasks could only be done, were there sufficient well-trained staff and qualified preservationists who are often in short supply in less-developed countries.
Despite the aforementioned technological advantages, historical artefacts should be displayed in where they are initially discovered or unearthed. It is self-evident that such objects embody distinctive values of a civilization, so only by possessing them, will the local historians be able to analyze and then re-enact parts of local history which could have been lost due to upheavals such as wars or social unrests. By doing so, later generations can have a better understanding of historical events associated with an artefact, which could be obtained by a few who could afford to travel overseas. Regarding the lack of required preservation techniques, the “hosting” countries should assist the ones of origin in constructing museums with appropriate storage rooms and training local experts, instead of persistently keeping the historical objects in where they are not supposed to be. More importantly, this could promote international ethics between rich countries with the rest.
In conclusion, while these historical objects are safe in internationally acclaimed museums, it is imperative to return them to their country of origin for the benefit of the later generations.
- Some people believe women make better leaders than men in companies or government To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 89
- Music and other arts seem to be features of every society In what ways are music and other arts important for societies and for individuals 84
- many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 92
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70807453416 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36301421177 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6654624152 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.166666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313994322241 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121193384127 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1006975848 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210577182098 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708594201053 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.