With the increase demand of fuel people should look at the other untouched fuel places. Do you agree or disagree .
It is an irrefutable fact that the world is enduring global energy crisis due to rapidly-increasing economic activities and industrial operation. Some people wonder that whether the benefits of extracting fossil fuels such as crude oil and natural gas in faraway places eclipse its drawbacks or vice versa. Personally, I strongly believe that the advantages of extracting energy from faraway places dominate its drawbacks.
The first significant reason is that excavating fossil fuels in isolated places will substantially contribute to nations’s economy. In fact, extracting and refining crude oil are currently accounting for a large part in the total GDP of many countries such as Russia, Quatar, UAE. Moreover, since these sources are untouched, the oil pockets will contain a vast quantity of crude oil and natural gas. For example, the gulf of Mexico is a faraway places which contain lots of oil under the ocean level. Consequently, countries whose advanced technology can extract fossil fuels and become thriving as well as prosperous.
The second crucial argument is that exploiting remote energy sources will greatly reduce the number of energy conflicts between nations. We all know that since fossil fuels were discovered, countless wars have been waged for the control of this energy source such as the well-known Gulf War. As a result, when countries strive to extract energy from unknown places, they will definitely evade unecessary wars. For example, countries such as Russia are trying to extract oil and natural gas in Antarctica – a location that has no confused benefits about energy.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that the merits of exploiting fossil fuels in remote location exceed its detriments for that it can contribute greatly to nations’s GDP and create peace in the hot spots known for energy rivalry.
Due to increasing world demands for oil and gas energy, people need to look for new sources of energy in remote and untouched natural places. Do advantages of locating these sources outweigh disadvantages damaging such places?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'place'?
Suggestion: place
...xample, the gulf of Mexico is a faraway places which contain lots of oil under the oce...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35649546828 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83406552843 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1057705453 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.2 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112647586251 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408056451174 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482358815583 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751927591077 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489788760185 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.