An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage of the natural environment, what are the causes and possible solutions?
It becomes evident that the rise in consumer demands poses a considerable threat for the environment. While the arising problem can be serious, it is notable to take into account the reasons, which will be the base for the solution.
Regarding the root of the problem, the explicit exploitation of natural resources plays a devastating role. While the effects can be subtle at first, the seemingly harmless practice can only make matters worse long-term. Ultimately, humanity will become one of the victims of the demise of the environment. Additionally, production of goods can only be possible via hosting a number of factories. These production plants not only take up space for natural habitats, but they also produce toxic fumes that can heavily put life of land creatures at risk. At the end, overload of hostile gas means shortage of edible resources.
However, as a productive community, this life-threatening puzzle can be addressed by taking a number of measures. Firstly, promoting the use of bio-friendly essentials is precisely recommended. This solution not only satisfies users' demands, but quick bio-degradation also benefits the environmental status by a substantial degree. Secondly, by using materials like plastic or nylon - that are hard to degrade biologically - for scientific researches, a considerable number of projects and experiments can be carried out. As a result, what start out as harmful subjects for natural life can turn into useful tools for remodeling the environment.
Overall, while it can be hard to manage the arising problems regarding the unusable environmental change through the production of goods for consumers, there are efficient measures that can be taken to combat troubles.
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- People are living in a throwaway society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are its causes and what impacts can it have 80
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations 61
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 67
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s lives and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42592592593 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1263556748 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3899992673 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.642857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106299238304 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386676646793 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430390172007 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621312288905 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241338060103 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.