Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Financial supports have been widely regarded as one of the prime remedies for world-wide poverty. However, a permanent solution to such tragedy can only be established only if developed nations work together to provide other types of help. I would like to further express my support for such claim, along with my own suggestions to combat poverty in affected nations.
Remedying poverty with money, if anything, will only damage the development of those nations. One purely logical example of this comes from an undeniable nature of the way money is frequently used for purposes including drugs-trading and prostitution. However, another point of interest, in which little attention has been given, is the fact that a continuous stream of financial income can only divert such countries away from their real mission, and that is the establishment of well-maintained facilities in health, tech, and education.
A way to approach poverty is by establishing good medical facilities in impoverished regions. Such development places an emphasis on the physical health of individuals in poor countries, and that in turns allow them to partake in productive work in maintaining the nations' wellness. Besides, an essential part of life is education, and this can be further developed via construction of more schools with long-lasting maintainance of educational programs. An emphasis on education not only relieve the youth of the responsiblities of an adult but it also prevents them from committing crimes.
I would like to end my statements by establishing that the old way of 'financial support' to tackle poverty is a temporary remedy for a deep-rooted disease due to the reasons above, and a proposal for such would be the development of great facilities and a prime focus on education for the youth in the affected areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 56
- Some people think that Art is an essential subject for children at school while others think it is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 73
- People are living in a throwaway society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are its causes and what impacts can it have 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...e in productive work in maintaining the nations wellness. Besides, an essential part of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26369863014 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10684772958 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565068493151 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4522322087 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.727272727 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.094738231942 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360694823 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259118698305 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0573734742594 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025699167172 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.