increase tax on petrol. do u agree?
In the wake of social development, green issues have become more serious than ever. As a consequence, whether should the government raise the tax on petrol to solve these problems is a highly debated conversation. My view is that the gas cost should definitely be elevated.
It is irrefutable that an enormous number of vehicles on the road is the main reason which cause traffic congestion as well as pollution. In these regards, a huge amount of emission and toxic gas that comes from these automobiles could worsen environmental situations. Therefore, if the government increases the affordable price of petrol, there would be less frequently used means of transport and solving the problems as well.
As well as, in many countries, the taxes on personal car owners have decrease, which leads to the bombing of vehicles in inner cities. To illustrate, in 2015 in Vietnam, the cars taxes have gone down to 0% and the traffic jams have happened more regularly since then. Thus, the idea that the authorities lifting gas taxes should be launched as soon as possible.
Despite its obvious benefits, raising petrol prices also poses threats in varied level. Particulary, those whose works depend mostly on cars like drivers, of course would confront massive spending on gasoline. Not to mention that those working as drivers could be breadwinner and must raise family as a whole. Nevertheless, day-to-day life may probably be adjusted.
In conclusion, it can be said that lifting the gasoline price would redirect the situation of traffic-load and air quality. By doing so, we firmly sure that we and the next generation will no longer suffer from serious congestion and pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-01 | xthanh | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-21 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-28 | Anh Thi | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- should government invest on medical and education? 78
- the benefits of cars? 78
- should ban dangerous sport or not? 78
- space travel have negative or positive effects? 89
- 1.Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. Other argues that they should spend more money on medical care and education. Discuss both view 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10144927536 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7848911231 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0137132328 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144498159589 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396484634521 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484614554032 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0668205111405 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257073231443 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.