Some believe that giving final assistance can increase the poverty rate while others think this is one of ways to reduce it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Numerous individuals argue that donating monetary aid to poor people prompts the increase ini poverty rate, while the opposite disagree. This essay would deliver both opposite views which I will elaborate further.
First and foremost, those who believe in financial support for poor society argue that this could be in form of educational support. Seemingly, obtaining degree title seizes greater job opportunities in order to even better financial status. The system would bring the rise of employment rate, leading to stable economic growth. Furthermore, supporting Micro-Small Medium Enterprise (MSME’s) in fiscal matters result in higher employment opportunities for the communities. As seen in Indonesia, The country experiences larger percentage contribution of MSME’s both in employment and on GDP by services sectors. The poverty rate was decreased by the growth of education sector in the early 20”s.
In contrast with the aforementioned points, many societies claim that monetary help causes inflation. This would carry out unfavourable conditions such as the increase in basic needs. Take what Ukraine endured provided by American monetary aid as an example, the raises the country’s inflation percentage higher than several decades earlier. To state further, this program could make them depend on and acknowledge it as other parties’ duty. When the communities start avoiding personal responsibility to achieve better finances, they could allow excessive reliance on supports. Such circumstances may hamper the economic growth in which Africa have been faced for a decade.
To conclude, the argument states that the disadvantages of financial aid seems more significance. Those include excessive spendings of the national budget and creating dependency. This is provided that financial assistance prioritises a crucial issue in terms of educational system.
- People believe famous people s support towards international aid organisations draws attention to the problem while other think celebrities make the problem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- There is more and more outrage and anger common in society today Why is this Is this a positive or a negative development 67
- The tendency of news reports in the media to focus more on problems and emergencies than on positive developments is harm to the individuals and the society as a whole To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some feel that punishment should focus more on rehabilitation instead of long prison terms Others feel prison terms are important for social stability Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some feel that individuals should have the right to strike in all jobs while others feel there are exceptions Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...would deliver both opposite views which I will elaborate further. First and fo...
^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired bracket or similar symbol
...owth of education sector in the early 20”s. In contrast with the aforemention...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81227436823 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.977177325 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664259927798 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2301516768 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7058823529 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119706057534 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351686354373 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383176801276 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749195374937 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449345725723 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...would deliver both opposite views which I will elaborate further. First and fo...
^
Line 3, column 690, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired bracket or similar symbol
...owth of education sector in the early 20”s. In contrast with the aforemention...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81227436823 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.977177325 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664259927798 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2301516768 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7058823529 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119706057534 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351686354373 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383176801276 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749195374937 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449345725723 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.