An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
There is no rose without a thorn. Similarly, technology comes with both benefits and disadvantages. For example – cars make our life more convenient, but it adds pollution to the air. Computers can indeed do massive calculations within fractions of a second; however, it makes the human mind lethargic.
A picture is worth a thousand words. As proved, visual learning is more effective than traditional education. Nowadays, we can quickly learn and understand the concepts using videos. Platforms like Coursera, Edx, and Pluralsight provide thousands of free courses taught by people from all over the world to learn different technologies. Today, it is so easy to connect, share documents, and ask questions from anyone across the globe. Sites like LinkedIn, Jobhunt, and Indeed help students to get placed in companies globally. The scholarly section of Google is one of the best places to find earlier research papers and do researches.
However, sometimes, students do not utilize the Internet for their benefits. Instead of learning, they waste hours chatting and watching movies. Sites like Facebook, YouTube, and Voot can be a source of distraction. Students quickly get addicted to online games. Moreover, all the data on the Internet is not always accurate, which can create chaos among the public.
Replacing books in schools is not a good idea as they contain correct and to the point data which are necessary for the given subject, and there is no way that a student can get distracted from it. Besides, not every place has an internet facility, so computers and tablets will be useless. Although examinations cannot define a student's intelligence, yet they are necessary on their part, as they provide a quantitative report of student progress.
In brief, instead of replacing traditional ways of teaching, technology should complement the training. With proper management and restriction, technology can enhance learning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Mimibae 985 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Mimibae 985 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | drake | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | PHAM ANH THU | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | prachirai | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University’s social media advertising campaign, organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university. Summarize the information by s 67
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend? What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time? 61
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
- the chart below shows the highest educational degree earned by King City residents and the average household size in King City from 1950 - 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
.... Although examinations cannot define a students intelligence, yet they are necessary on...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37785016287 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87776490328 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638436482085 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1759216161 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.619047619 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.619047619 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142688695404 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324197425627 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369395738163 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685446463144 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546099572809 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.