With the increasing popularity of computers and calculators, student literacy is decreasing dramatically. What are the positive and negative effects the progress of science and technology has brought about?
Introduction of devices such as computers and calculators have brought a significant change in society and the sole reason for it is the advancement in science and technology. Being quite popular among young generation it may be of utmost use in education. However, with great invention comes greater responsibility thus it is necessary to eliminate the negative effects of it.
To begin with, the development of medicines, automation and many more can be accounted as the merits of the technology. Firstly, the internet can be used in various activities like searching, gathering knowledge which boosts up the literacy rate of a country. Secondly, automation has reduced the amount of work to a great extent thus ultimately benefiting the skilled sections of the community. Moreover, a real demonstration of scientific theories can be shown to the students to clear out their doubts and eventually help in raising the standards of education. For instance, a study in the UK showed a drastic increase in the intellect level of a primary pupil from 60% to an astonishing 82% by just giving examples of real-life scenarios.
On the other side of the coin, the story is different, the creation of laptops and calculators do have a pessimistic way on some. To add, the younger generation spends most of their useful time playing games which may prove science to be a curse and sooner or later causing a devastating effect on their brain and health. Furthermore, indulging in solving simple problems on phones may decrease the overall IQ of a person. To prove my point, a study conducted by the universities of Canada showed a damaging effect on the brain as a whole and 2% depletion of grey matter which accounts for the motor function of a being.
To sum up, though science proves to be a blessing in disguise to some it has more advantages and inventions of technology should be used in a diligent manner to set a good example for upcoming generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-25 | ngannguyen2408 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | Divs | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | mayankmm | 77 | view |
| 2015-07-30 | Vipgill544 | 86 | view |
| 2015-03-27 | bwosti | 77 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Students in our school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources(eg internet or TV),do you agree or disagree？ 61
- With the increasing popularity of computers and calculators student literacy is decreasing dramatically What are the positive and negative effects the progress of science and technology has brought about 77
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 89
- Prevention is better thn cure. Out of country's health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education n preventive measure. Agree or disagree?? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a diligent manner" with adverb for "diligent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...inventions of technology should be used in a diligent manner to set a good example for upcoming gene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92121212121 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98932290382 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8699112425 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130587071688 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403887797301 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307665382101 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766942643647 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422161466519 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.