Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures are required that can be effective?
There is not even an iota of doubt that with the ever-expanding need of people to travel from one place to another, be it for work or recreation has led to traffic congestion even in conurbations, furthering to disastrous air pollution. Therefore, many a people support the idea that by hiking fuel prices, individuals would consider travelling less, which would aid in decreasing this menace. However, I do not accord on it, since it would not be possible by every nation. According to my school of thought, improving public transport and incentivizing electric vehicles is more beneficial.
To initiate with the argument of a certain echelon of the society whose core belief is that raising fuel costs, would decrease the problem of growing traffic in the cities. This is because should the cost of natural gases increase, then people would deter from frequent travel. For example, Finland in 2017, imposed exuberant amounts of taxes on fuel which led to a decrease in their road traffic to about 15%; however, it did not affect the wealthy. Therefore, hiking the prices of combustible materials used for travelling would not be enough as it would only impact a few financially unfortunate people
While certainly hiking fuel prices is an option, there are far better methods to curb this problem. Primarily, increasing transport hubs within a city would be beneficial. To be precise, public transport had better be accessible to the common man within minutes of his home and at a very reasonable price. India for instance, in New Delhi made public transport for women free of cost, which helped them reduce private transport, after which Delhi saw a clearer sky. Moreover, the more the governments of countries start providing incentives to the people who use electric cars, the more people will be agreeing to support the cause.
To reiterate, even though raising prices of fossil fuels such as petrol or diesel to curb the problem of traffic congestion and air pollution is a viable idea. However, I believe that a wider approach such as towards public transport and hybrid cars would be far more beneficial.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures are required that can be effective 84
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated is amusement parks for the purpose of peoples recreation Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages Explain your reasons and supp 73
- Environmental problems such as pollution and climate change affect all the people in the world Although global decisions are made to reduce these problems the solutions are not effective Why are the solutions ineffective How can these problems be solved G 56
- It is commonly believed that nowadays main factors that affect a child s development are media pop culture and friends A different point of view is that family plays the most significant role Discuss both views and give your opinion 42
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...use electric cars, the more people will be agreeing to support the cause. To reiterate,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04829545455 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70888540013 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7120723863 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.928571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116904114159 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451632567771 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387769325567 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794503649228 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253697162521 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.