In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?
There is no gainsaying the fact that many a person nowadays is not only living all by himself or with his immediate family, but also avoiding joint family households. The culture of the past which is staying with extended families is becoming rarer, whereas, staying alone and maintaining a nuclear family is propelling, the reasons for this being: the need to migrate for a better job prospect and easy upbringing of a nuclear family.
To initiate with the positive effects of this modern way of life. People find it easier to travel for a better job, rather than scourging for jobs where they live. To be precise, should they travel and search for a better job, they do not have to settle for what they get in their city. For example, according to a survey conducted by the Indian Census in 2012, 32% individuals chose to leave their families and travel just on the pretense of finding a job. Second to this is the fact that with the ever-increasing prices and stagnant incomes it is immensely difficult for an individual to survive in a joint family. For instance, according to a news article published by The Hindu, the average cost of maintaining a joint family has spiked by about 11%; however, the average growth in income has increased by a mere 2%. Therefore, in today’s world it is better to stay as a nuclear family. It does not go without saying that there are a few minor drawbacks to it.
Having said that there are a few negative aspects to staying alone which are first and foremost, single living can make a person lonely and depressed which would not be possible if he were to stay in a joint family. This is because in a large family if not for younger people the grey haired are always available to comfort in the time of need. In other words, the more an individual has human interaction, the more psychologically fit he will be. Moreover, Staying in joint families may keep a person happy mentally but the physical part of it, which is sacrifice, still remains. For instance, in a joint family one can not be flexible with time and money as it needs to be shared accordingly.
To reiterate, even though living alone or in a nuclear family might be straining one’s mental health, this can be dealt with, as one had better cater a little chunk of his time towards staying connected with his relatives. As is evident that minimalism is the new positive trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | An Hai Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | An Hai Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | An Hai Nguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | Sukh037 | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | yennguyen189 | 78 | view |
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated is amusement parks for the purpose of peoples recreation Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages Explain your reasons and supp 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures are required that can be effective 84
- ln many parts of the world children are given more freedom than in the past ls this a positive or a negative development 93
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s staying connected with his relatives. As is evident that minimalism is the new p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63764705882 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55941169711 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510588235294 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0989380351 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.941176471 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200828507483 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668467776539 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466547949605 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130942706959 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248519566368 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.