increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. to what extent do you agree or disagree? what other measures do you think might be effective.

The expansion of traffic and ever increasing pollution are thought can be prevented by high cost of fuel.

Ironically, there is no doubt that substantial amount of diseases have attributed to dramatically rise of vehicles. Furthermore, today human beings have came across with unprecedented scale of pollution, which might be detrimental for them. In order to work the mentioned matters out, it is claimed that artificially risen price of fuel can be very helpful. Unquestionably, this is the essential approach to avoid of abundance vehicles. When the point is about extra expenditure, people attempt to dispose of using private cars. For instance, initial 2008 Hummer H2 was the most popular car through the Americans. Interestingly, as petrol was grown as individuals started to get rid of H2. Of course, this kind of reduction absolutely negatively influence to the environment.

However, it is not an easy task to increase the price artificially. Global conflicts of superpowers might cause of marking the fuel cost down, so there should be another way. Moreover, over rose cost is directly treat all people, including individuals who do not use cars in their daily bases. So this seems little bit unfair for the first glance. Apparently, we have late to restrict the number of machines, because they have already became unchangeable part of modern life.

In fact, new technologies might give us an opportunity do not get rid of ordinary cars but substitute them with interchangeable once, which moves by electrical power. This approach can solve majority of problems and predominantly pollution rate will be reduced.

In conclude, increasing rise of petrol is not the best way to cope with mentioned matters, instead of this electrical cars can be the key of beneficial future.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...s. Furthermore, today human beings have came across with unprecedented scale of poll...
^^^^
Line 6, column 309, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ars in their daily bases. So this seems little bit unfair for the first glance. Apparently...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r of machines, because they have already became unchangeable part of modern life....
^^
Line 6, column 437, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...of machines, because they have already became unchangeable part of modern life. I...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in fact, kind of, no doubt, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03258410568 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652777777778 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5326925761 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.9411764706 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155143058174 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432327394176 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416584377958 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959938394214 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023346874984 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.