Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
There is a common belief that the price of gasoline, which is the main source of car energy, should be increased in order to solve the current problems, such as traffic jams and pollution. However, from my perspective, this advice may be true in some part and there are other more effective ways to be introduced.
It is true that higher price of gasoline can inhibit the increasing traffic and pollution. Normally, drivers drive their private cars more often in that the cost of driving is negligible, compared with the convenience that private cars bring. If the price of gasoline is considerably high, the expense of driving is no longer minute. Accordingly, people may choose to drive less, which can reduce the traffic congestion and air pollution for fewer cars on the road mean less car exhaust in the air. However, exorbitant price of petrol may disorder the economy. Once the price is outrageous, chances are that the number of drivers will decline, which may frustrate the relevant industries, such as car production and sale.
In order to address the traffic and environment issues, from my point of view, other effective ways should be employed. For one thing, the government ought to encourage the public to take public transportation by building more public transport systems. Considering the special lines, such as subway routes, passengers may not come across traffic congestion during rush hours. For another, the government is supposed to exploit new and clean energy for car vehicles. Due to less emission produced by the environmentally-friendly energy resources, like solar power, there will be little environmental contamination from cars.
To conclude, by virtue of the disadvantages and advantages of gasoline price growing, public transportation and clean energy should be put into use, possessing the strengths of reducing traffic jams and pollution and maintaining the stability of a nation’s economy.
- In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society? 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 67
- most countries want to improve their standard of living through economic development, while others think social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Differences between countries are becoming less evident nowadays. People tend to have the same films, music, bands, TV channels, etc. To what extent do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages? 11
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, may, so, such as, for one thing, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29449838188 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04114838306 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2741971389 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.857142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147905448238 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556306114755 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489891594454 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100072488154 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483444580557 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.