Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The state of the environment is irrefutably one that is alarming for both the important world leaders and ordinary individuals. It is believed by some that the latter part of the society can leave no impact on the current circumstances - only those with power and money can change the tides. However, I believe that the individuals are a force not to be neglected in this battle against pollution.
First of all, it goes without saying that the amount of normal citizens far outnumber that of government officials or coorporation administrators. Therefore, their actions can collectively create a wave of effects impossible to underestimate. Second of all, the individuals in a community are in a position much easier to influence those around them. If a neighbor of yours starts making environmentally conscious choices like installing solar panels or recycling wastes, you are undoubtedly more inclined to make simillar choices than if you saw a company brand do the same. The quantity and intimacy of a community, when combined, can play a major role in deciding the situation of the world's environment.
Another reason why I disagree with the notion that individuals are powerless in improving our surroundings is the psychological gravity they can put on legislators and company owners. Some supporters of this idea may argue that it is the government and CEOs who make the laws and impose lasting changes on the globe, for they hold the most rights while also responsible for the majority of pollutants. However, in a society that runs on democracy, we - the people - are the ones who actually make big decisions. If the community shows a preference for environmentally friendly lifestyles, those in power ought to listen and make changes according to our wishes.
To sum up, individuals are vital in the mission to save the environment. Not only are they large in number, but also large in pressure when united, which would result in a noticeable difference in the long haul.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 73
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...r role in deciding the situation of the worlds environment. Another reason why I di...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...save the environment. Not only are they large in number, but also large in pressure when united...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08256880734 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06099607476 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587155963303 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8080671398 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274892341108 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692014149009 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485526607031 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138443007566 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252280395128 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.