Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Discussion over environmental preservation has always been a long-standing debate in the world. Some people argue that governments and large companies should take full responsibility of protecting the environment, as there is no action taken by individuals can change the situation. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this idea and strongly believe that everyone, including residents and governments, should contribute to address this issue.
For a start, environment pollution is a man-made consequence, which is caused by human. Several minor everyday activities such as littering, using plastics or driving release a large amount of pollutants to the environment. Therefore, a reduction on these actions would result in more hygienic ecosystem, which is human's responsibility. Simply put, if each person in the world stop driving for a day, there would be a significant decrease in the amount of exhaust released into the atmosphere.
Another point to consider is the limitation in the actions that could be taken by governments and large companies. The governments are only capable of propagandising about eco-friendly activities, imposing bans and regulations on destroying the environment. Some large companies have altered their energy sources to the renewable ones such as solar energy, wind energy,... However, there is no regulation saying that a company must use renewable energy due to the profits and difficulties in building such solar panels or wind turbines in the city. Therefore, people should raise their own awareness of protecting the environment and participate in some environment preservating activities organised by governments, local authorities or volunteers. A small action at the moment will change the entire situation in the future.
In conclusion, it is not only governments and large companies' responsiblity but also individuals' contribution in environmental preservation. We can rest assured that with the participation of the Earth's residents, the environment will be improved quicklier and more efficiently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the average duration of housework women did unemployed part time employed and full time when compared to men who had full time work in the UK between 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 91
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant write at least 150 words 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e ones such as solar energy, wind energy,... However, there is no regulation sayin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74183006536 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38583067713 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59477124183 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3014950895 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.133333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176047657393 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553864519395 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589017544031 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117616087728 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737587784125 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.