In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money?
In this day and age, a lot of countries has joined the worldwide digital developments with significant financial investments, especially in internet improvement. As the technologies are developing rapidly, it is necessary for governments to join the race of internet experience improvement, which promotes the whole national industry.
It is true that digital revolution has had a number of profound effects on certain aspects of national industry, which stimulates governments to invest in this field. The fact that the top countries have developed 5G technology puts a pressure on other countries to join the race of digital developments. Without proper internet access, it sets a challenge for countries to develop other fields, especially sciences. Moreover, internet plays a pivotal role in certain aspects such as researches, entertainments and following up the news. Therefore, governments should invest a huge financial aid in digital improvement.
Obviously, in this digital age, as internet is the foundation, an indispensable part of national development, governments should take priority of internet improvement. Thanks to developed internet access, we are able to obtain precious knowledge and apply new technologies from other countries. For instance, thanks to the access to the international knowledge, Vietnam has adopted new technology in agriculture, which provides high quality products, such as rice and sweet potatoes. Moreover, investment in technology is investing for future as it has strong connections with other fields of the industry. In short, investment in technology is the most practical use of government money.
In conclusion, due to the rapid digital developments, a vast amount of countries has joined the race of internet improvement. Governments should take priority of internet development as it provides sufficient benefits for the whole country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | nguyễn nga | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | nguyễn nga | 61 | view |
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 61
- The charts show information about the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in short, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75088967972 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31183103733 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505338078292 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8940369323 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188400743557 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794153926678 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642660067982 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127469272064 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024506126178 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.