Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is often argued by some that citizen are not the right person to improvise the nature and habitat but it can be done by the enforcement of government act and big entrpreneaurs. However, I disagree with the statement because every individual have the courage to protect and develop our surroundings many ways like waste disposal, organic materials usages, tree planting joined with the govering bodies.
People can tackle the environmental problems and try to flourish the nature by avoidence of plastic and inorganic material usages. initially, Dispoal of toxic byproducts would often make devastating effects to the earth, instead use of biodegradble products minimise the toxicity which can be practiced by common individuals. Secondly, every family members can joined in tree planting groups and revamped the greenery in their on habitats. Along with that every individuals can prevent the deforestation, over farming, cultivation ,and stone and earth mining to large extent. For instance, environmental protectors or groups would sent the people to aware and inform the culprits of wild distratctors to the laws.
On the other hand, people who supported the statements that a largly active rules and regulations from the governemnt would make a major impacts on nvironment. To elaborate, officials have the position to take action and improvisation of nature. Likewise, large compnies can minimise their disposal and manage a proper environment friendly routes to dispose their wastes and byproducts to some extent. Eventhough, co ordinated plans and facilities would escalated the total outcome of planet normal structure. Government can elaborate their programs with the support of individual rather than immediate push over.
To sum up, government or big corporates can do more than one individual to renovate the environment. Nevertheless, being a productive and intellegent individual can do their own part to their atmosphere thereby a complete assumption of individual could be vary in terms of environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Initially
... plastic and inorganic material usages. initially, Dispoal of toxic byproducts would ofte...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...deforestation, over farming, cultivation ,and stone and earth mining to large exte...
^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'send'
Suggestion: send
...nvironmental protectors or groups would sent the people to aware and inform the culp...
^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'escalate'
Suggestion: escalate
...co ordinated plans and facilities would escalated the total outcome of planet normal stru...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53054662379 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03237085491 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614147909968 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4754509093 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197131254161 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653542704207 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452727761015 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119333893366 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040449887233 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.