the inequality between rich and poor nations
In my opinion, I agree that the inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before. There are two main reasons leading to the gap between countries.
Firstly, with development of global information technology, it begins comparison between countries in general and people in particular. Almost people also want to share their life on social networks such as Facebook, Instagram, Tweeter, Tiktok, Viber, etc. therefore, it is not difficult to recognize living standards and development in each country through pictures, videos or their activities in daily life.
Secondly, the rapid growth of the world economy makes the gap between rich and poor become clear. Developed countries can grasp world economic trends better and use existing resources to organize production and distribution instead of developing countries, because they need to spend more time and facilities to produce. For example, with appearance of Covid-19 almost countries in the world must face with Disease, Poverty, Death and Economic Decline. However, developed countries like The United States of America, Great Britain, Rusia, Germany, China, Japan,… they have studied and understood how the virus works so that they can successfully prepare vaccines to prevent diseases for people as well as support for poorer countries including Vietnam. Meanwhile, poor countries have a shortage of medical staff, funding to treat patients and have to wait for aid from other countries.
However, in order to reduce the gap between countries, the capacity of workers is one of the most essential. Developing countries must not only focus on improving the quality and skills of their workforce, but also on the quality of education. In the universities, colleges and vocational schools should reduce theoretical lessons and increase practical time at real businesses for students to learn working environment in companies. Beside that, countries must concentrate on their strengths. For example, the Vietnamese government should develop for the country’s agriculture to balance development among provinces.
In short, in order to balance the rich-poor gap between nations, that nation must first balance the gap in its own nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-28 | May My | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | May My | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | Dunjunhehe | 11 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | Ptanhh | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | lili__nhnh | 89 | view |
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 96
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing for example through cell phone tracking and security cameras In many cases the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening Do you think the advantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 561, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...at Britain, Rusia, Germany, China, Japan,… they have studied and understood how th...
^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to work'.
Suggestion: to work
...t real businesses for students to learn working environment in companies. Beside that,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in general, in particular, in short, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52631578947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80324429632 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0678050656 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225009692399 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841287517521 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137972073429 0.0667982634062 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183092130093 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171137793298 0.056905535591 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.