International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages

Some people had argument that international tourism is an entertainment form preferred by many travellers, others claimed it just have costly great expense and time of us. We can not deny values it brings to, but I think travelling abroad exists some serious difficulties that makes foreigners sometimes have bad impression about Vietnamese tourists.
First of all, this form of entertainment is only for people who actually are in good conditions because international tourism cost too much money from tickets of transportation to hotels or food expenses. Although every nations has their own traditional culture and many diverse interests to explore, we should choose some to travel for saving money and fuel. For example, airlines have to use fuel to carry out most flights for tourism purpose.
And to follow closely with using too much fuels, we have to face the second problem is pollution. Tourists nowadays need to have a sense of civic responsibility because too much trash is eliminated after their travel tour. It comes to consequences that local people’s living environment will be directly affected and downgraded. Many natural islands and beaches with wild beauty are predicted to be destroyed one day by the unconciousness of some tourists.
In conclusion, despite many benefits which international tourism provides to us, drawbacks below outweigh all of them. Therefore, according to me, if you have an intention of travelling anywhere in Vietnam or abroad, improving your awareness as well as your relatives’s is considered the most significant thing you can change for tourism.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
.... And to follow closely with using too much fuels, we have to face the second probl...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34387351779 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00745583115 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679841897233 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5736115064 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160709104273 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619506968774 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065660272357 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976658493195 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413948046293 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.