International travel is becoming cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, international tourism is increasingly cost less as some countries open the border, so that the rate of foreign tourists inclines year-to-year. Positively, this brings more income and circulates economy sector for nations, and these merits outbalance the demerits.
It is believed that the benefit of inexpensive overseas tourism is that countries can receive much money for treasury revenue due to money spent by the visitors since the doors are opened. Although this may damage the environment immensely because of the environmental issues, such as waste, it cannot surpass the advantage because the income is higher than revenue allocated to maintain the natural surroundings. For instance, in 2018 Indonesia lucratively gained billions of dollars from Australian who had summer holiday trips in Bali, and the local authorities only expended two fifths of the gaining to look after the environment of the tourist spot to become clean from various inorganic wastes.
Furthermore, states which are well-known as affordable destination and bombarded by international massive tourists has a merit in order to advance economy sector. Nevertheless, the detrimental impact of allowing the visit influences the culture of indigenous. Nonetheless, this gives more positivity due to solving job field scarcity, especially in developing world. For instance, Thailand is one of the most well-known South East Asia country with cheap budget and has been assisted by the tourism activity to develop the urban and rural economy circulation. Even though the western cultures forced the local belief, the government has a brilliant idea to alter the local tradition to be the entertainment, giving jobs for local people.
In conclusion, the advantages of foreigners visiting countries exceed the disadvantages. If nations want to avoid the negativity, the tourism should be managed well with a strict regulation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ional tourism is increasingly cost less as some countries open the border, so that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61034482759 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03605954331 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648275862069 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4501595588 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.583333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189430744073 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596680255007 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517786985715 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111848695398 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556248230734 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.