"International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited.
Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?"
The past five decades have witnessed a dramatic increase in international holidaymaking. It is an indisputable fact that this trend brought significant values to both holidaymakers and host countries. However, I intend to argue that the overall impact of international tourism has actually been negative. The primary benefits and drawbacks associated with this trend are as follows.
On the one hand, it is an undeniable fact that international tourism brings major benefits to tourists and destination countries. Tourists are able to widen their horizons and acquire intimate knowledge about new cultures. A particularly salient example of this is that tourists who visit Vietnam might consume scrumptious foods entailing exotic delicacies or traditional cuisine, for example, coconut worms, balut, or broken rice. Further and even more importantly, though, global tourism has also brought with it undeniable economic prosperity. Destination countries enjoyed great benefits from traveling activities. Other thriving businesses associated with tourism are also booming.
On the other hand, international holidaymaking also exports negative aspects of western culture and creates adverse environmental impacts. While destitute people cannot afford to travel to faraway places, developing countries such as Vietnam, Thailand, or Indonesia have become the playgrounds of the wealthy from affluent ones. As a result, the influx of mainly western tourists brought to these poverty-stricken countries thorny problems such as prostitution, alcoholism, and drug abuse. Even more disturbing, though, is the environmental degradation resulting from international tourism in many parts of the world. A specifically notable example of this is the Great Barrier Reef in Australia where countless boats, divers, and snorkeler have gradually destroyed vast sections of coral. I believe that those pressing matters require greater regulation of global tourism.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my position that international tourist industry may cause numerous issues at large. Though they are by no means insurmountable, it is highly unlikely that they are fixed in the foreseeable future.
- Highest education level of women in someland 67
- "International travel has many advantages to both travelers and the country visited.Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?" 89
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing.What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society?How can this problem be solved? 73
- When children start school, teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than their parents. Agree/disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey are fixed in the foreseeable future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90506329114 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16799180678 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636075949367 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3567099398 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0901814398277 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273600229205 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337132208724 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497273033974 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208145186281 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.7 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.