Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are widely differing views on the issue of whether we should preserve endangered species or not. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I intend to argue that conserving wild species has a crucial role to play in this day and age. The reasons for my position are as follows.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that protecting wild animals is essential to balance the ecosystems. There are delicate arrangements of plants and animals in which each species relies on the others for survival. The disappearance or introduction of a new breed would disrupt the balance by breaking the food chain and altering the habitat where they live. This imbalance would return and haunt us in unexpected ways. One particularly salient example of this is the arrival of rabbits soon after European settlement in which they have been competing with other species for food and have destroyed farmers’ crops. The extinction of a predator can cause plagues by allowing their preys to multiply unchecked. Whilst ecological change constitutes a potential risk to our environment, it is clearly in our interest to preserve the wildlife and thus, protection of wildlife is entirely justified.
Yet, perhaps the strongest argument in favor of preserving endangered species is that all life has its own intrinsic value and therefore, hunting or poaching them should be made illegal even if they are not useful to human in practical ways. What is more, humans are responsible for the loss of habitat of a multitude of endangered species, thus, we should make every possible effort to conserve them.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my perspective that saving protected species from extinction is of the utmost importance to our ecosystems in order to maintain the balance of the environment and the value in and of themselves. Because the consequences in the foreseeable future are insurmountable, emergency actions to protect wildlife animals would be warranted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | ppatel | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | mohammad.iraf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | wIsaac | 56 | view |
- In many countries women no longer feel the need to get married. Some people believe that this is because women are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring.To what extent do you agree? 73
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to new environment by establishing a minority community. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16718266254 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95133328553 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594427244582 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9980647109 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0985080350609 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314658000109 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334350675883 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537453239614 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217301108651 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.