The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that the internet can separate them and push individuals to avoid social interaction. Although it is true that the internet brings drawbacks under certain circumstances, I would argue that people also keep in touch with each other wherever thanks to the internet.
There are many reasons why the internet can interfere with people’s interaction. Firstly, the internet allows people to easily gain access with each other, which would lead to an unnecessary face-to-face conservations. Hence, this kind of habit will cause them to lose interpersonal skills. Secondly, social media has brought them far away from each other. In fact, due to the convenience of the internet, some teenagers would prefer to chat through some social platforms rather than hang out to meet face-to-face, such as: chatting on Facebook or Twitter. This activity can not convey people’s emotions and facial expressions, which could result in arising conflicts and misunderstandings.
Nevertheless, I believe that the Internet enables us to maintain contact with anyone regardless of their locations. To begin with, due to a tendency of updating status on social networks, people can follow activities of anybody that they want, which would mean that they can have interactions without meeting. If the internet does not strongly develop, we would lose contact with acquaintances and relatives living faraway, such as: abroad students. Furthermore, owing to the widespread presence of the internet, people do not waste too much of their time on information exchange no matter where they are. For example, we just need about 30 seconds to mail, but we have to wait more than 30 days for letters to be sent in the past.
In conclusion, while the internet can adversely affect individuals, I am of the opinion that it is a positive way to associate with people’s relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Archana vijaya | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | tranminh | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-08 | elisabetta_fedele | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-16 | ntngan14 | 89 | view |
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 87
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are On the other hand it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialize Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'conservation'?
Suggestion: conservation
...uld lead to an unnecessary face-to-face conservations. Hence, this kind of habit will cause t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28428093645 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97828669013 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625418060201 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7479184394 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280939220233 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930220356156 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057432695613 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159636482568 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048082064856 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.