The internet has vastly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
It is widely suggested that the advent of the Internet has dramatically promote exposure to vast quantities of information among citizens of the civilized world. Personally, I think that this is definitely a merit.
Firstly, from the perspective of a scientist, I believe that the Internet has been the catalyst for countless major scientific breakthroughs made in recent times. This is because as scientific papers and journals are uploaded and constantly updated on websites available for public viewing, remarkable transformations for laboratorial protocols and research directions in labs around the world have been enabled. For instance, thanks to the publications accessible on the Internet, the sought-after flow technology is being applied in chemistry laboratories around the world as it helps to improve chemical reactions' efficiency. This has resulted in more synthetic compounds that can be used for medical treatments of countless diseases.
Secondly, as a consumer, I also believe that the Internet has also bridged a much better connection between consumers and suppliers. Companies in all spheres of life are putting interesting advertisements of their products online to reach more customers and thanks to this practice, buyers have not only more shopping options but also the knowledge to make informed decisions. A good example here is the success story of Nike, a sports apparel brand that has been utilizing the power of social networking platforms such as Facebook to promote brand recognition among Asian markets. As a result from that, Asian consumers could now enjoy sports clothing items such as shoes or gym shirt that are of considerably higher quality than the products they were subjected to buy in the past.
In conclusion, from my personal knowledge, I can only conclude that as the Internet increases availability of information, numerous positive developments will inevitably take place.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-12 | pardeepkumar0492 | 89 | view |
2020-08-28 | Titi2lope | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at le 73
- The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minute 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write a 78
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant exa 67
- Write about the following topic:Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'promoted'.
Suggestion: promoted
...advent of the Internet has dramatically promote exposure to vast quantities of informat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reactions'' or 'reaction's'?
Suggestion: reactions'; reaction's
...e world as it helps to improve chemical reactions efficiency. This has resulted in more s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52364864865 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09310236358 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618243243243 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.454911432 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.636363636 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147334635154 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551319021732 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279674288206 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850468785636 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197708924183 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.